No Wonder

I’m 30 and I just found out I was adopted.

I was raised in a family always making comparisons… everyone’s like “ah you’re just like your *insert relative*” in looks, behaviors, etc… However, since everyone tried to hide the fact that I was adopted, no one EVER compared me to anyone. Unfortunately, my mom always said I looked like a spitting image of my dad… I always have felt like the ugly duck. Always really sad as a child that I didn’t have anyone to look up to, who I shared silly facial expressions, mannerisms, or physical features with, etc. My baby cousins were always called beautiful with their eye color matching the coveted eyes of my mother.. my other cousins were all petite, while I stood out like a sore thumb, SUPER tall… growing up my cousin (like a sis) was never been able to share clothing with me or beauty hacks because I’m so different from the rest. I feel like I’ve always been an outcast and so, I’ve been unable to bond in any of the ways, I should’ve…

Awful, that it’s always meant so much to me, looking at photographs of family and their history/culture was so big to me, and now, learning all my background has nothing to do with me at all!? My adoptive mom died 15 years ago and my adoptive dad disappeared when I was 1.

Infertility and Reality

I read today where a woman wrote – In reality, unless you have gone through infertility, no one should value your opinion. You can not relate. Adoption is a beautiful thing. It gives many children loving homes, with two people who love them. It does not matter if your child is biologically yours or not. The love is the same.

This is, of course, the standard adoption industry narrative.

A woman shares that she saw this on a thread about infant trauma from maternal separation. She responded to this with “WHOA!! Did you just say that no one who hasn’t experienced infertility should have their opinion on adoption valued?

“So the mother who lost our children to a predatory industry – our opinion on the pain of that, even though it’s literally killing us, should not be valued. And children who lose their biological connections forever without their consent, and live forever with the pain of that loss, should not have their opinion valued.

“Only those who can’t have children should have a valuable opinion on whether they can continue to have access to other people’s children??”

An adoptee shares her lived experience –  I’d argue that actually, my infertile adopted mother did NOT love me the same. She grew a love for me, sure. She says she loves me, but I am telling you, it’s absolutely NOT the same as if they had just given my biological mother the chance to love and raise me with the proper supports in place. I was robbed of proper love from my mother because I was adopted.

A mother of loss (child surrendered to adoption) writes – yeah beautiful for the adoptive parents. Not necessarily for the child or the natural parents. But our opinion doesn’t matter. Another woman from that category says – So because someone hasn’t gone through a thing, they shouldn’t have an opinion on that thing. Hmmm.

Then this from an adoptee who HAS struggled with infertility for almost 15 years – This take always fills me with so much anger. I NEVER once considered stealing someone else’s child. Instead, I directed the love into working with children and it brought me so much happiness and joy – no destruction of a family necessary. And then after the long battle, I had my *own* son and I can tell you that I never felt the way I feel about my son about any of the other kids I cared for – regardless of how much I cared for them. I loved them deeply, but they weren’t *mine.*

She adds this about her son — we are each other’s genetic mirror, the bond happened while he was still in my belly, it’s been there intrinsically. Never artificial. His birth tested the bond between my adoptive mother and I, and let me tell you it became crystal clear just how *not* hers I am, once she saw the bond between my son and I.

A Happy Outcome

Jay Kuo and Riley Puyue Kuo

Jay Kuo is one of my favorite Substack writers, LINK>The Status Kuo, for his insights into all things legal and political. Therefore, I have been aware of his journey towards fatherhood.

Generally, I am against surrogacy but in this case, I am happy for Jay and his daughter. He has been respectful and considerate of his gestational carrier. My objection to surrogacy in general is simply the separation of a baby from the mother’s womb the baby grew in.

Sometimes, it makes sense to take that path as it certainly did in this case. The baby girl will have a wonderful genetic mirror in Jay. She already looks so much like him !! I’ve no doubt she will want for nothing, especially there will be a continuing abundance of love in her life, as there has been since her beginning. Jay’s sister Mimi will be a great help for him in raising a daughter and there is a large extended family as well. They are actually embarked on a road trip to introduce her to them as I type.

He joyfully shared her early moments in the outside world – “Riley already seems to know what she needs and demand it readily! She grabbed the bottle with her hands when the nurse and I fed her, she cried when she wanted to be held, and she definitely let us know when she had her first poop!”

I almost feel a sense of kinship – she was born in La Jolla CA where my dad’s genetic, biological mother and father were living when he was conceived. I look forward to occasional updates from Jay as he and his daughter grow together as a family. Congratulations.

Bangladesh Sisters Reunite

Kana Verheul, center, with her niece, right, and her long-lost sister Taslima, left. 

Excerpts from a story in The Guardian – LINK>The stranger across from me was my sister: how one adoptee uncovered a tragic past.

After decades of trying in vain to find her siblings, Verheul joined forces with other people in her situation to set up an organization called the Shapla Community, creating a network of hundreds of Bangladesh adoptees raised in the Netherlands. If she could not find her own family, she could at least help others find theirs.

Verheul was among those from Shapla who spent hours interviewing Bangladeshis with extraordinary stories about their children, many of whom claim they were taken for adoption abroad without their consent. It was one of these interviews that led her to the cafe meeting with a woman from the area where she was born. Verheul tried to see if there was any family resemblance with the woman, but could not see any. “Some details matched but some did not,” she says. “Her sister was called Nasima. I truly believed that Kana was my real Bangladeshi name because it was in my birth papers. I couldn’t comprehend that I may be Nasima. Then I asked them the name of the village I have in my Bangladeshi passport, and she said, ‘Yes, that’s where we lived before.’”

Verheul was still not convinced, so she asked if there were any birthmarks. “The woman said her mother would often tell bedtime stories about the sister who was lost, that they both had the same birthmark on their leg. This was a shock because I have one on my knee.” In disbelief, the women headed to the toilets and revealed their almost identical birthmarks. They hugged and cried, and soon afterwards, Verheul says, “I finally saw the resemblances between us – in her hands, her mannerisms. I have really funny feet, and she has the same funny feet,” she laughs. “It felt undeniable, but I couldn’t accept it fully until the result of the DNA test came in.”

Verheul returned to the Netherlands and anxiously awaited the results. Two weeks after they met, a DNA test confirmed they were sisters. “I remember like it was yesterday. I was driving on the highway when the doctor called. I could finally accept that this was my sister. Immediately I got a huge headache. I had to stop next to the road. I started crying. From all over, from my ears, from my toes, from deep inside me. I cried for an hour.”

Amid the joy of finding the woman she had spent decades trying to find, her sister, Taslima, was able to explain to Verheul how she came to be adopted abroad as a baby. The story she shared horrified Verheul, but it also confirmed suspicions that she had had for years. Verheul, a mother of two, clearly adores her “wish parents”, the term she uses to describe couples who adopt. Taslima told Verheul their mother had never intended to give her away. She explained that her father had three wives, and one of them had convinced him to take Nasima to a daycare home nearby when her mother was away because she had become ill and needed medical care. When Verheul’s mother came back and discovered what had happened, it was too late. Nasima had already gone from the children’s home. She had been adopted by a couple in the Netherlands who believed she was an orphan. “My mother divorced my father because of this,” says Verheul. “My father passed away in 2012, my mother in 2014,” she says. “But they were still alive when I was searching for my family in Tongi. At one point, I had even stood on the doorstep of my father’s home. That still hurts.”

In 2017, Shapla was officially founded, to help adoptees find their relatives in Bangladesh. The organization began recruiting fieldworkers in both countries – volunteers who would interview relatives, collect data and identify leads that could eventually result in a reunion. They set up a DNA database and started to collate everyone’s adoption documents. “That’s when we saw certain patterns – the adoption storylines were all the same. The mother had died of poor health, father died in an accident, and grandmother or aunt brought the baby to a home.” Some information was identical, says Verheul, like “a copy-and-paste job”. The group believes that instead of international adoption, the focus should be on supporting vulnerable families, strengthening youth care systems, and improving quality of care in countries of origin so children can be cared for in familiar surroundings. Their argument is in line with the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, which recognizes the right of children to grow up in their own culture, befitting their own identity.

“As an adoptee you often hear, ‘You’re lucky, now you have a good life.’ But you cannot really compare the two,” says Kana. “In one sense I feel lucky that I have the best of both worlds. But nothing makes up for the loss you had to endure. Because I lost my family and my real identity.” She recently bought a plot of land in the village named in her passport. “I want to build a house there, for my sister to live in if she wishes. I would like to spend time there too.”

Foster Care Reality Check

Sadly, that Rose Garden we were NOT promised at birth is a nightmare for some children and their families. Today, in my all things adoption group that includes foster care former youth and related issues – this question was asked.

Foster Parents: What do you provide that biological families don’t? No specifics!

This was a balanced and complete perspective, I believe –

If the biological parents didn’t have to worry about finances, they would have been able to provide stable housing and access to food, which they were not able to provide. However beyond those two things, there is a lot the biological parents would not have been able to provide, even if given access to a stipend – emotional safety from emotional abuse – safety from physical and sexual abuse – access to mental health care, due to understanding and education, not due to lack of medical insurance or transportation – medical care for the same reason as above – appropriate attention to emotional needs, affection and secure attachment – a model for healthy adult behaviors (as in, an adult who does not actively impose sex onto children) – acceptance of LGBT status – home environment that caters to their emotional and mental health needs – access to extracurriculars that promote mental and physical health such as sports – space to develop individuality without fear of rejection. There are also things the biological parents can provide that a foster parent will never be able to provide: a genetic mirror – the comfort of being in a “normal” family – never having to explain one’s adoption status / history, awkward conversations one can be forced into – insecurities a foster child or adoptee may feel if the parent has or conceives biological kids at some later date – not feeling like one is a charity case or having to feel like they are required to be insanely grateful all the time – missing their biological parents is a really big issue, regardless of any history they caused the removal from those parents – grieving a loss that the foster parent will never be able to fill for that child.

And there was push-back on this and other similar responses – “I can tell you all are foster parents…so many child protective services buzz words…security, safety, stability etc…I know the original poster asked for no specifics ,so you don’t have to tell me, but you all should be questioning whether you provide anything actually concrete or are you blowing sunshine up the behind by inflating what you offer ?”

Foster care is troublesome as is the reason it exists. This is enough from me today.